Skip to content
Ali Akbari
Menu

Evidence boundaries

Limits

Lab results are labelled as lab results. If something isn't listed here, I don't claim it.

Security

Evidenced

Boundary

  • Not verifiedExternal penetration test or security audit of anything listed here.

    Security claims are backed by automated tests of specific scenarios, not by independent review.

  • External penetration test or security audit: NOT VERIFIED. (boundedcode-prompt-injection-containment)
  • Container escape resistance verified in CI: NOT VERIFIED (runtime probes run only locally). (boundedcode-sandbox-hardening)

AI infrastructure

Evidenced

Boundary

  • PlannedAn LLM gateway with streaming, tenant-aware rate limiting across replicas, failover and cost metering.

    Planned as inference-gateway. No claim until its tests and load-test reports are public.

  • Not verifiedGPU serving, vLLM, KServe or Triton in production.

    I have no GPU-serving evidence to publish. BoundedCode runs a local model on one laptop GPU, which is not production serving.

  • That frontier escalation improves task outcomes: NOT VERIFIED. (boundedcode-escalation-policy)

Backend

Evidenced

Boundary

Verification

Evidenced

Boundary

  • Not claimedThat AI-written code is correct because tests pass.

    A passing test proves only what it asserts. That is why claims here name the tests that support them.

  • Correctness of agent-written fixes in general: NOT CLAIMED. The gate only withholds TASK_VERIFIED when evidence is missing. (boundedcode-fail-before-pass-after)
  • Public, inspectable evidence: NOT AVAILABLE (proprietary). (employment-ai-native-delivery)

Data systems

Evidenced

Boundary

Distributed systems

Evidenced

Boundary

  • Not verifiedInternet-scale or multi-region behaviour.

    No public evidence covers multi-region operation.

  • Not claimedPublicly verifiable scale and latency figures from employment.

    Employment metrics are proprietary and are not published here; employment evidence is labelled as such.

  • Public, inspectable evidence: NOT AVAILABLE (proprietary). A reference is available on request. (employment-realtime-data-path)

Observability

Evidenced

Boundary

SRE

Evidenced

Boundary

  • PlannedSLOs with multi-window burn-rate alerts, a chaos experiment and a published postmortem.

    Planned for platform-lab. My production incident work is described only as employment history, without proprietary details.

  • Public, inspectable evidence: NOT AVAILABLE (proprietary). (employment-production-operations)

Cloud

Evidenced

No published evidence.

Boundary

  • Not claimedAWS or Azure deployment experience.

    I have no public evidence of AWS or Azure work. A Terraform AWS reference architecture is planned and will be labelled REFERENCE, never DEPLOYED.

GitOps

Evidenced

No published evidence.

Boundary

  • PlannedGitOps delivery with Argo CD, signed images and admission policy.

    Planned for platform-lab; no public evidence yet.

Kubernetes

Evidenced

No published evidence.

Boundary

  • PlannedKubernetes cluster administration (kubeadm upgrades, etcd backup and restore, troubleshooting drills).

    Planned as public, CI-verified lab drills in platform-lab. Nothing is claimed until those drills are published.

  • Not claimedOwnership of an employer's production Kubernetes clusters.

    I have not administered Kubernetes in production, so it is not claimed.

Every claim also lists its own limitations on its evidence page. Never claimed while this list says otherwise: certifications I do not hold, production Kubernetes administration at an employer, cloud deployments from reference code, GPU serving, and “deployed” or “production” labels on lab work.